Personal Injury Case Studies

We are often asked if there’s a cut-off time to lodge a claim for personal injury.  In our previous blog post, we explained the legal limitations within a time frame of three years for these types of claims and the importance of taking action as soon as possible.

In this post, we will provide two real-life cases seen here in Australia and how they were judged under the law.

Jump to:

Case 2:

Case 1:

This case example was a claim for medical negligence. 

Recently, Justice Brown was required to assess whether, or not, an extension to the limitation period should be granted. The basics of each case are:

Lang v McArthur & Ors [2019] QSC 119: 

An alleged medical negligence action. The alleged negligence was against two doctors. Dr McArthur allegedly did an intramuscular injection of penicillin into the buttocks of Ms Lang, who was only three months of age in or about 1978. Dr Mcguire (An Orthopaedic Surgeon) did around 16 surgeries between 1978 and 1991. Ms Lang’s limitation period expired on her 21st birthday. Ms Lang was 42 years of age at the time of the application, with her limitation date having expired about 21 years previous. 

Ms Lang alleged that the material facts of a decisive character were:

  • On 19 October 2017, Ms Lang met with her general practitioner and saw a radiology report that said she had a deformity of her left leg, a fact which she says she had not previously known. Further, on that date, she was advised that she had extensive arthritis of both legs, feet and hips which may have certain consequences in the future because her condition was poor and deteriorating quickly including that she may potentially be wheelchair-bound in five to 10 years.
  • She observed a ‘V’ shaped staple in her foot in radiology imaging which she had been unaware of; and
  • Discovering the identity of the General Practitioner who was said to have given her injections in her left buttocks when she was a baby.

Judgement

In short, Judge Brown rejected the first assertion as Ms Lang had significant symptomology, functional issues and wastage in the left leg since she was at least 18 years of age. That is, it was known to Ms Lang that she had a deformity long before 19 October 2017. Judge Brown was not swayed that the injury was sufficiently trivial until on 19 October 2017 whereupon it became known to Ms Lang of the severity of her injury. That is, Ms Lang’s injury has always been significant. In relation to the identity of the General Practitioner Dr McArthur, Ms Lang’s mother did not say she did not know who the doctor was or that she had forgotten the name of Dr McArthur. She was simply reluctant to provide that information to Ms Lang until pressed. 

Judge Brown also went on to assess whether there was a prima facie right of action. Ms Lang called a Dr Ulahannan to give evidence but only against Dr McArthur (the General Practitioner) and not against Dr McGuire (the Orthopaedic Surgeon). In essence, Dr Ulahannan gave evidence of the risks of giving an intramuscular injection in the buttocks of a child. He did not have any direct evidence that Dr McArthur had given the intramuscular injection incorrectly. Dr McArthur denied having given an intramuscular injection to Ms Lang at all based on his practice at the time.

The Court decided not to exercise their discretion to allow this matter to proceed for many reasons including Dr McArthur not being able to identify his professional indemnity insurer, having limited assets and having incurable prostate cancer. The records of Dr McGuire had been destroyed and there is a significant chance the respondents will not be able to defend themselves.

In the circumstances, Judge Brown chose not to allow leave to proceed.

Case 2:

This case example was a claim for medical negligence. 

In Walker v Tucker [2019] QSC 141 Mr Walker consulted Dr Tucker on 11 October 2013 displaying symptoms of back pain and paraesthesia in both legs. Dr Tucker referred Mr Walker for a CT scan which showed appearances of a soft tissue oedema or a nerve sheath tumour in his thoracic spine. Dr Tucker wrote a referral to the Princess Alexander Hospital emergency department. It was a point of contention as to whether Dr Tucker told Mr Walker to go to the Princess Alexander Hospital emergency department.

Mr Walker was driven by his partner back to their home and subsequently by a friend to the emergency department at the Ipswich Hospital. He was subsequently taken by ambulance to the Princess Alexander Hospital emergency department, whereby an MRI was undertaken and surgery was done that evening. Mr Walker ended up a paraplegic.

Proceedings were commenced by Mr Walker which did not include Dr Tucker. This was based upon the evidence of Dr Lynch who did not believe Dr Tucker was negligent by not calling an ambulance.
Mr Walker was informed that Dr Lynch had changed his mind on 3 August 2017 (in a report dated 19 July 2017) and proceedings were filed against him on 18 July 2018. The three-year limitation for bringing an action against Dr Tucker had expired on 11 October 2016.

To support this application, Mr Walker obtained an opinion from a Professor Noel Dan who gave evidence that the paraplegia would likely have been avoided if the surgery had been performed earlier on the night of transfer.

Judgement

The Court found that the Dr Lynch report of 19 July 2017 was a material fact relating to a right of action. The Court found that, until that point, Mr Walker did not have evidence to support a right of action against Dr Tucker. In fact, the Court found that before 19 July 2017, Mr Walker understood Dr Tucker was not negligent based upon the earlier report of Dr Lynch. Judge Brown also found a prima facie cause of action existed based upon Dr Lynch, Dr Dan and other evidence.

As you can see within these two cases, it is critically important for a person to lodge a personal injury claim as soon as possible and not wait to make a decision. Speaking with a personal injury lawyer will help guide your decision and manage the process effectively and improve the likelihood of a positive outcome.If you are looking for advice about a personal injury claim, please contact us today to arrange your FREE initial consultation.

Related Tags: Personal Injury Lawyer Miami, Injury Lawyers Gold Coast

 

Recent Articles

Cyclist accidents and compensation: Are you covered as a driver?

As our roads get busier, accidents are almost unavoidable – no matter how careful we are! If you get into an accident with another vehicle driver, both drivers probably have insurance to cover injury and perhaps even damage to the vehicles.  But what if you get...

When your employer denies your workers compensation claim

Every year, WorkCover Queensland receives around 95,000 workers compensation claims – and rejects about 4 per cent of them. It doesn’t sound like much, but it adds up to 3,800 declined claims each year. Many of these are compensation claims for work-related...

Understanding your rights after a car accident in NSW

In Australia, every state and territory has a scheme to protect people who are involved in a motor vehicle accident. In New South Wales, this includes compulsory third party insurance (or a ‘green slip’), which you need to buy before you can register your car. If...

Changes to workers compensation laws in Queensland

Australia’s workers compensation laws are complex and always evolving. Each state and territory has its own scheme. In 2023, a review of Queensland’s workers compensation scheme found some weaknesses in the system. As a result, the Workers’ Compensation and...

Changes to NSW Motor Accident Injuries Scheme

If you’re injured in a motor vehicle accident on New South Wales roads, you may be eligible for compensation under the NSW Motor Accidents Injuries Act 2017 (Motor Accident Injuries Scheme). However, the scheme has undergone recent changes that you should be aware...

Medical negligence in Queensland aged care facilities

In Australia, we’re lucky to have a high-quality health system. However, the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety showed us that problems do occur in the aged care system. The aged care sector has a duty of care to prevent harm to our elderly and...

Claiming workers compensation after retirement age in NSW

If you suffer an injury or become unwell due to your work, you are protected by workers compensation law. All workers can receive compensation in the form of weekly payments and medical benefits while they recover from their workplace injury. But what happens if...

How does no-win no-fee work in NSW?

In Australia, you have the right to legal representation, regardless of your financial situation. To make sure our personal injury clients get the legal help they need, we at Main Lawyers offer a no-win no-fee arrangement under certain circumstances. This means...

What to do in a car accident while driving in NSW

Unfortunately, motor vehicle accidents are extremely common in New South Wales. For that reason, NSW has strong laws to protect anyone who is hurt in a car accident in the state. If you’re injured in a car accident in NSW, you can claim benefits – whether you were...

Claiming workers compensation with pre-existing injuries

Workers compensation is insurance that businesses take out to cover them if workers suffer a workplace injury. It provides benefits such as lost wages and medical expenses, and even a lump sum payment for permanent impairment.  But it’s not as simple as it sounds. ...

SETTLEMENT CALCULATOR

SERVICES

h

ARTICLES

CONTACT